🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to restart atomic negotiations with Washington as long as it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi said exclusively dialogue produced results, and revealed recent overtures had originated from intermediaries to reopen discussions with the American leadership. He claimed Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran had not yet reached a point to permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to access struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Walking a Complex Course

Araghchi is navigating a complex path since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be proceeding from a stance of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more resilient in military terms and mentally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Negotiations Unexpectedly Terminated

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that concluded with the American leader claiming the locations had been obliterated. Afterward, European countries employed their authority to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Tehran representatives said they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with American involvement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Representatives stated three times they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the deal to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Position

Iranian officials said the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems very probable the proposal could be resurrected in various formats if negotiations restart.

The US president recently said he had been getting signals that Iran desired to restart talks, but privately Tehran representatives say they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from the United States either directly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been accused of non-responsiveness in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his speech to the gathering, aimed to portray the US as a controlling nation that exploits the idea of worldwide standards, Araghchi declared the 12-day war revealed the dispute could not be resolved by combat operations. He stated the assaults commenced with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making confidence challenging to reestablish.

Diplomacy Continues the Final Solution

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had fled negotiations; it was the United States and the Western nations that had repeatedly sought to dictate their desires during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be viable and stays the final answer to settle disputes, but its standards, guidelines and principles must be respected."

"If they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of respect and respect, they will receive a answer in the equivalent tone."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the conflict of restoration and reconstruction, the foreign minister said he was certain Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We gained numerous insights from this engagement; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He continued: "We successfully passed this war. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to destroy, stays intact. The installations and equipment, if eliminated, will be restored; what is crucial is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have developed more resilient, more united, and more supportive of the leadership and the country in the face of this invasion."